Handling Sequences of Belief Change in a Multi-agent Context
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper focuses on the features of belief change in a multiagent context. Agents have to consider information received from the other agents and the ability of how to change beliefs after receiving a message is a prerequisite for many multi-agents problems. The agents are embedded in an environment where they are communicating and they have to prevent potential internal conflicts in their beliefs. We study the belief change operators in that context. Our approach is to consider that agents’ belief state is a set of pairs 〈belief, origin of the belief〉 combined with a preference relation over the agents embedded in the multi-agent system. The belief revision procedure for handling received messages is a syntactic approach which aims at selecting the minimal subsets of the belief base in conflict with the received information and, according to the reliability of the sources of the conflicting beliefs, removing the less reliable beliefs in order to handle the received message. The proposed belief change operators ensure that an agent makes as few changes as possible but also handle iterated belief changes by preserving the order on the beliefs.
منابع مشابه
(Dis)Belief Change Based on Messages Processing
This paper focuses on the features of belief change when agents have to consider information received from other agents. We focus on belief change operators when agents have to process messages about a static world. We propose to consider agents’ belief state as a set of pairs 〈belief, origin of the belief〉 combined with a preference relation over the agents embedded in the multi-agent system. ...
متن کاملSource-Sensitive Belief Change
The AGM model is the most remarkable framework for modeling belief revision. However, it is not perfect in all aspects. Paraconsistent belief revision, multi-agent belief revision and non-prioritized belief revision are three different extensions to AGM to address three important criticisms applied to it. In this article, we propose a framework based on AGM that takes a position in each of thes...
متن کاملArgumentative Credibility-based Revision in Multi-Agent Systems
We consider the problem of belief revision in a multi-agent system with information stemming from different agents with different degrees of credibility. In this context an agent has to carefully choose which information is to be accepted for revision in order to avoid believing in faulty and untrustworthy information. We propose a revision process combining selective revision, deductive argume...
متن کامل(Dis)Belief Change and Feed-Back Loop
This paper focuses on the features of belief change in a multi-agent context where agents consider beliefs and disbeliefs. Agents receive messages holding information from other agents and change their belief state accordingly. Agents may refuse to adopt incoming information if it is considered as not reliable. For this, agents maintain a preference relation over other agents embedded in the mu...
متن کاملBelief Change in a Multi-Agent Framework
Title Abstract: \Belief change in a multi-agent framework" 1
متن کامل